Quote:
Originally Posted by CardPadre
Yeah, I just thought they gave him a straight out “altered” result due to that cardsaver you showed. So however incorrectly he submitted it, if they didn’t just return it and kept his money, they sorted it out, evaluated the card and made a determination.
So I’m just saying if all the above is indeed the case…him going from “altered” to you as a “5.5” is sooooo much of a change of opinion to make without accountability.
|
Grading is a matter of opinion not accountability. It’s important to also sub correctly and remove any possible bias when submitting with regards to submitting in holders. I submitted a raw card and got the best professional opinion at the time of grading from the given grader. I don’t see anything wrong with any of this on either side.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk