Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins
Thanks Al. I'm aware of what the point of the program is.
I have not tried out the authentication experience with raw cards as a seller, but had heard some horror stories of ostensibly inexperienced authenticators issuing rejections based on holding raw sellers to super critical standards. My point in discussing the raw was that I think it's not good if because of such experiences, raw sellers are more likely to disclose less (i.e. not list a condition range at all...) on such listings.
|
When you put up a card for sale on Ebay, you need to list the condition as either:
Near mint or better: Comparable to a fresh pack
Excellent: Has clearly visible signs of wear
Very good: Has moderate-to-heavy damage all over
Poor: Is extremely worn and displays flaws all over
When you sell a card over $250, it goes to PSA for review. I imagine their review standards are comparable to their grading standards, but with a bit more tolerance. For instance, if you pop a PSA 4 out of its slab and sell it on Ebay as Excellent, I bet it would pass the review.
On the other hand, if you list a card as Near Mint and it has surface issues, be prepared for it to be rejected.