Quote:
Originally Posted by paul
Thanks Raulus. I missed the original thread because it was in the water cooler section. The original thread (and the original post) focused on the 60/40 split. But the lawsuit focuses on the claim that Lelands took items they weren't supposed to take. That was kind of an afterthought in the original thread.
I'll be watching to see how this shakes out, and hoping for the reappearance somewhere of the Seaver items I was bidding on.
|
The complaint focuses on more than just the items taken. It also alleges that the contract contained contradictory commission terms that make it unenforceable.
This exhibit purports to be the entire contract (front and back of a single page). The "Conditions" page isn't signed, but it describes a sliding-scale commission structure that differs from the "60/40" split on Schedule A.