Quote:
Originally Posted by Fandom0610
I wonder between the two companies who's more inconsistent. Nobody's perfect and both are going to have their faults, but honestly ive seen more people complain about PSA's inconsistency than any other grading company. SGC's holders imo look so much better, but unfortunately the hobby has turned into a sh*t show so people want PSA because they command more money for some reason. To me it seems like people don't trust SGC's grading as much. Ive always heard they are very stringent, but who knows.
|
PSA caters to the lowest common denominator. Same reason McDonalds sells more Burgers than Ruths Chris. Same reason Bud Light was always the #1 selling beer (despite tasting like p!ss water). It doesn't matter which one is obviously better.
As for the other post above, calling CGC into question.... Check out PSA's ratio of vintage SportsCards to Pokemon, TCG and Ultra-modern cards. You'll be shocked at how miniscule PSA's numbers are for vintage SportsCards. And once all the vintage cards eventually get graded, this segment will not matter to them in the least. They already act as though it doesn't exist, and have done absolutely nothing to benefit the vintage collector.