Posted By:
Jerry SpillmanThank you Jeff and Jay I totally agree.
When I reread my reply to Julie I realize it was not appropriate. I
read her post in haste and misinterpreted her meaning as to compare my
complaint of card damage may be mailbox related which then was accepted
by Trevor as real. I acted without rereading to make sure of the
meaning of the message. I was not thorough. Not right - no excuse.
Moreover, I was not even appreciative that she came forward with a
similar incident by the same seller.
Julie, I am sorry if I offended you in anyway. Thanks very much for
your post. And thanks to these two gentlemen for bringing my attention
to my error and I am able to apologize to you directly.
Trevor, I did my best to explain the exact nature of the damage to the
cards I received from this seller. This damage is inconsistent with
damage caused during delivery. When you stated - but if I had someone return
my cards in worse shape than I sent them I would charge them too - I
thought you may have miss read my post. The 'juror' was not meant in
any an official way any more than if I said judge and mean a Judge.
Thanks for you opinion.
Justice wears a mask.
Coming on to this thread I noticed the seller in question here had
called an associate to add a positive post for him!! It was not posted
for some reason so he is saying 'goodbye' to the board.
Calling people to vote!
Going to quit the game because his acquaintance allegedly can't play.
This is the Final Straw?
Is that the reason?
Is that similar to Buyer’s Remorse?
Is he any less guilty of fraud if more people vote for him?
This is not a contest.
This is a criminal act.
A refund is in order.