[Archive]

Posted By: gcalex

OK, I have no knowledge of the history of this card (never heard of it till I happened to read this thread) or the personal dealings involved, but it appeared to me that the criticism of Greg was ASSUMING his version of the facts, that is that he had an opinion that differed from PSA but no first hand knowledge that the card actually had been altered. I obviously can't speak as to what he knew or didn't know, I was just commenting generally on what seemed to me to be too high an ethical standard being suggested by folks, namely that one has to disclose one's own opinion when a card has been third party graded. That was my only point.