Posted By:
Hal LewisI agree 100%, and hate to even talk about all of this because someone might think that I am not standing behind the card.
My research shows that it was 1897-99, and PSA agrees.
I have exhausted every way that I could think of to try and "disprove" the dating of the card... so I obviously think this whole discussion is moot and irrelevant.
I guess I was just trying to make the point that I never even approached PSA about "refunding" the card because I never found a thing that said anything other than 1897-99.
I am ABSOLUTELY NOT just saying: "PSA says it is from 1897-99 and therefore it must be."
I am saying that this just happens to be one that PSA got right.
