Posted By:
Todd SchultzI think Burdick deserves credit for his work, but he screwed up on this one. He has the latest of the three sets with the lowest number, and even if he didn't know about the other set, he got it wrong, assuming chronology is of any importance. Morever, there should probably be four designations, because the "Sporting News" size Standard Biscuit can be found in association with either m101-4 or m101-5. He missed altogether the set that correlates to E135, which is surprising, because that set is not scarce, yet catalogued the unnumbered series of 80 set that may correlate to e121 and is hard to find.