Posted By:
Corey R. ShanusI agree that people can look at the top scan and have reasonable questions whether the card is real, which questions in the end may be satisfactorily answered upon comparing the scan to the original card back and seeing that the resolution/contrast and color depicted in the scan is materially misleading. However, Scott, what you're trying to do here is use the scan to prove the negative, namely that the card is not real. And, for the reasons mentioned (i.e., legitimate questions how well the scan portrays the actual card back, right down to the smallest nuances), I'm simply saying that that top scan in and of itself is inadequate to prove the card is not real.