Thread: PSA question
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 08-30-2007, 01:58 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA question

Posted By: Marc S.

you need to look at each edge under a loupe. I was a very advanced collector of the 1955 Bowman baseball set for many years...and that is one of the post-war sets that has the highest variation in card size, from the factory. Within a single pack, cards could be 1/8 to 1/4" oversize, or undersize. So from a card alterer's perspective, it is much easier to take an issue like that, trim down an oversized example, and have a card that "measures correctly", but is still trimmed.

The T-206 set is another example of this. I have heard many say how the average size of a T-206 has gotten increasingly smaller over the years.

You can also look at the opposite side of the argument. Just because a card is too small, it does not imply that it was trimmed. It only implies that it is small -- whether by trimming or because it was factory cut short is a different analysis altogether.

Reply With Quote