Posted By:
JKJeff may disagree 
but after reading these posts its a good thing we require actual evidence to convict someone and we dont merely convict people based on nothing other than hearsay and what your friends did.
As for "the scramble" - I love it. Now Clemens has the power to scramble the television signals. Just awesome. As long as we are going to make this into a conspiracy theory, I've heard through a friend of a friend's uncle's girlfriend that Clemens is actually a CIA assasin and that when the guy with the "organization" stated "clemens hasn't taken his shots yet" he was actually referring to a CIA hit.
Edited to add - this post should not in any way be interpreted as my supporting clemens. If he did it, he should suffer the consequences. However, sorry, I dont believe you can tell someone is lying simply based on their appearance/body language (hey all you law enforcement guys - when someone is believed to have committed the crime but shows no signs of lying while denying it, do you let them go? Have people proclaiming their innocence ever been wrongly convicted?). I like to see something a little more along the lines of evidence before someone is convicted.