[Archive]

Posted By: JimB

Scot wrote:

"2. No evidence of distribution as a tobacco product insert"

What about the tobacco ad on the back and existence of Ty Cobb brand tobacco tins? Even if it was a countertop promotion as opposed to inserted in the tins, I am not convinced that would disqualify it.


"3. No evidence of contemporaneous issuance with T206 subjects"

Thus far, no evidence to the contrary either. If such evidence does arise, I will agree that it is not a T206. Depending on the evidence, if such evidence ever does arise, the conclusions to be drawn could vary.
JimB