Toppcat
Dave
Sounds like you agree with my T206 "6-card" basic denominator theory. Anyhow, let's further consider the Sweet Cap 150,
Factory 649 sub-set. I think this was initially a 36-card design and ALC removed a subject (perhaps, either Cobb or Plank).
Whatever, that's besides the point here. Check-out this comparison of 1st series Detroit players......
Sweet Cap 150 (factory 649)................Brown HINDU
.................................................. Donovan (portrait)
Killian (pitching)..............................Killian (pitching)
O'Leary (portrait)............................O'Leary (portrait)
Schmidt (throwing).........................Schmidt (throwing)
Continuing.........
Sweet Cap 150 (factory 649)................Brown HINDU
Jim Delehanty....traded to Detroit 8/09.......DITTO
Tom Jones....traded to Detroit 8/09...........DITTO
I think the above data illustrates that there was not a "diabolical scheme" NOT to print Detroit players with HINDU or SWEET
CAP 150 (f649) backs.
So then, why did ALC not print Cobb with these T-brands ?
The "Factory #649 factor" mystery thickens ? ?
TED Z
|