| 
				  
 
			
			After a long day of work I was hoping to see more activity on this thread.  Oh well.
 Zach, interesting thought but I do not think it was a conspiracy.  Afterall, Goodwin & Co. was trying to boost sales by offering the public cards of their favorite players and teams.  If Goodwin objected to Detroit's acquisition of the big 4 and retaliated by not issuing certain players, I think they may have pulled Brouthers, Richardson, and Rowe together with White.  The main objectors to the Buffalo team purchase were the other team owners.
 
 On a financial side note, Detroit actually did well in 1886, 1887, and even 1888 due to the sale of their players.  None of the Detroit share-holders lost money.  The writing was on the wall however in 1888 when gate reciepts were no longer split, injuries to Thompson & Richardson (limited playing time), and a growing resentment towards manager Bill Watkins.  Detroit was forced to either disband or become a shadow of its former glory.
 
 And the answer I was looking for to my question was 1888.
 
				__________________Best Regards,
 Joe Gonsowski
 COLLECTOR OF:
 - 19th century Detroit memorabilia and cards with emphasis on Goodwin & Co. issues ( N172 / N173 / N175 ) and Tomlinson cabinets
 - N333 SF Hess Newsboys League cards (all teams)
 - Pre ATC Merger (1890 and prior) cigarette packs and redemption coupons from all manufacturers
 |