Regarding your ?'s in post #89......
" We should discuss whether or not we've seen more than one example of a lot of these combinations.
In this thread, Jeff posted a Chase/Red Hindu. I've never seen another.
My friend has a Cy Young glove/red hindu and I don't believe I've seen another.
And your Kleinow? Have you seen another?
There might be others out there, but not sure.
Why haven't we speculated on whether or not the above cards are rebacked?
If any of the Cobbs would break this new found pattern of not being found with a hindu back, it would
obviously be the Red portrait "superprint." "
Responses......
(1) Jeff's, REA, and mine (a beater) = 3 - Blue Chase / Red HINDU cards
(2) Your friend's and a beater that I know of = 2 - CYoung / Red HINDU cards
(3) Wonka's, REA, and a possible 3rd = 3 - Kleinow / Red HINDU cards
(4) the 3 "beater" cards noted here date back to the early 1980's (trust me, these were NOT re-backed
cards).
(5) The 6 super-prints are pretty consistent regarding the backs they were printed with. Red HINDU is
the exception....it has only been confirmed with Chance, Chase, & Evers. One fact is certain, all 6 are
AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 and UZIT No-Prints.
Rob....my question to you....you seem to be "fighting" this rash of re-backing that occurred approx. 10
years ago. Can you please explain why ?
Incidently, I have never seen this done with Caramel cards, is that perhaps, why you are skeptical of
what we are telling you regarding T206's ? ?
Finally, if you haven't read my thread on the BL 460 / Red HINDU connection, here is the link to it....
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...broad+leaf+460
Regards,
TED Z