[quote=teetwoohsix;811132]I have not seen many posts in this thread pointing out why it is NOT Jackson-just curious to hear why it is not him? To me, I can see the similarities
Clayton
Clayton - you have things in reverse. You have to tell us why one should conclude that extremely blurry photo is Jackson. How is anyone supposed to show you that it's not Jackson when all we have is the vaguest impression of a face. We just can't know. No one has said this isn't Jackson.
What we do know is that the facial recogntion part of the brain is easily fooled. It doesn't matter if it "resembles" Jackson.
Last edited by bmarlowe1; 05-23-2010 at 08:26 PM.
|