I'm confused
I know very little about rings so I am making this post not to take issue with what anyone has said but in the hope of educating myself.
The first thing that came to mind as I read the initial post was that the Turner ring is from 1955, and the Leland's ring from 1957. So isn't this then trying to compare an apple to a banana? Being from different years, wouldn't one expect them to look different? The post responded to this question with the following statement:
"By the way,although Turner's ring is a '55 and Leland's is a '57, the ring molds on the top of the ring are supposed to be 100% identical."
So could someone please explain what that means, and why rings produced in different years could not legitimately vary in appearance?
|