Quote:
Originally Posted by asoriano
|
that's awesome.
as for the PSA flip, some have argued that this is an old but legitimate flip. Now I know that PSA previously did not specify the backs on the T206 flips. And the typeset of their oldest flips looked different than currently. I'm not really aware of any other evolutionary changes to the PSA flips. In this specific case, does anyone have a T206, or any other card, where the PSA flip doesn't specify the set name? For that reason alone, I'd be leery that this is a fake.
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM.
Last edited by shaunsteig; 12-07-2010 at 09:50 PM.
Reason: correct typo
|