View Single Post
  #12  
Old 01-29-2011, 11:16 AM
tedzan tedzan is offline
Ted Zanidakis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania & Maine
Posts: 10,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novakjr View Post
I think what Rick was getting at, is that since the brand in question changed companies after the type-1's, and before the type-2's, it should be somewhat rational to treat them a two completely different issues, rather than "types" of the same designation. Basically, with this information, type-1's should not fall under the T213 blanket...Now, that they don't have a reliable designation, the question really is, should they fall into the t206's? or should they be assigned a new designation all-together?
David N

I think Rick has made an excellent point that reinforces that the T213-1 cards should be classified as T206's. After the American Tobacco Co. divestiture in 1911,
all subsequent tobacco card sets (T213-2 or -3, and T215-2) should logically have their own classification.

My question is....did Burdick take this into consideration ?

It doesn't appear so, regarding the T213-1 cards.


TED Z
Reply With Quote