Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave
OK, I see what the problem is now.
Most of you are only interested in the receipt/loa and not the autograph itself, and since it is not from whomever, and has one misspelled word, you reject the whole premise of the autograph being authentic.
Sounds very reasonable and intelligent to me.
|
Nobody has said anything about who the loa is NOT from. Please don't spin this off into another this guy vs. abc vs. fde debate.
If you think that it is reasonable and intelligent to take the word of a signature authenticator who can't spell signature, you're certainly welcome to spend your money how you like.
Personally, whether the signature is legit or not, I think the seller would have been better off leaving that particular loa out of the photos, as I can't see any collector who is on the fence about whether the sig is legit looking at that LOA and saying, "Okay, that clinches it for me, I'm in."