View Single Post
  #17  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:18 AM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC View Post
And that tax factor can possibly work to the player's benefit as well. You get $10M in one year, you get so much taxed at 10%, then so much taxed at 12%, and so on per the federal tax brackets in place up to where the balance of that $10M salary all gets taxed at the current top federal tax rate of 37%. Break that into ten years of $1M of salary though, and now you have 10 times the amount of salary being taxed at 10% instead of 37%, 10 times the amount taxed at 12% versus 37%, and so on. Unfortunately some of that savings is offset by the additional social security tax the player will also have to pay each of 10 years, but I believe the player still comes out ahead federal tax-wise by extending their salary through deferral.
very good point.
In the end it was a two decided agreement between the team and player so at the time it was good for each.
Potentially looking back maybe not
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Shoeless Joe Jackson Autograph
Reply With Quote