View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-30-2019, 03:59 AM
jackwesq jackwesq is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 10
Default Shanus v. R.L. Americana, Lifson, Robert Edwards Auctions, et al.

My apologies if this has already been discussed, posted, etc. But I came this on a blog I regularly visit.

"Before the Court is Defendants Robert Lifson and Robert Edward Auctions' (collectively "REA") motion to seal and redact portions of the trial transcript and exhibits. REA argues that they have a strong interest in redacting and sealing portions of the transcript because they reference confidential business dealings, contracts, and settlements relating to customers who were not parties to this action.

After a five day trial, the jury found that REA, with the assistance of nonparties Peter Nash and his business, Cooperstown Monument Company ("Cooperstown"), fraudulently manipulated the market through a deceptive bidding and purchase scheme. Plaintiff Corey R. Shanus contends that this motion is nothing more than an attempt to conceal evidence of REA's fraud from the public…."

Interesting to say the least. And the motion was denied.

https://reason.com/2019/08/29/no-sea...-a-civil-case/
Reply With Quote