Quote:
Originally Posted by thatkidfromjerrymaguire
1952 Bowman is a better set than 1952 Topps for these reasons:
1. Better artwork
2. Prices aren't inflated which makes it more collectible
3. Smaller set which makes it more collectible
4. Mays is a scarce high number but still more affordable than it's Topps counterpart, despite it's better image and lower population.
5. The Stan Musial card is one of the best looking baseball cards EVER (and Topps is lacking Musial)
6. The image on the 1952 Mantle makes me think of the Mona Lisa...while the double printed Topps Mantle is sort of ugly.
OK, I'll admit the omission of Jackie Robinson in Bowman is a pretty big downside...but overall Bowman is still better.
(OK, feel free to kick me off the boards for these opinions)  |
+1. If only it had a Ted Williams and even, maybe, a DiMaggio.
__________________
192/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92)
126/208 T205s
28/108? Diamond Stars
Last edited by jsfriedm; 06-17-2022 at 03:06 PM.
|