[deweyinthehall]

I took a break from vintage a few years ago and decided to concentrate on filling my collection with the Donruss, Fleer, Score and Upper Deck sets from 81-92. Back in the day I had perhaps a third of all these sets, but sold them off maybe 20 years ago, and the last time I collected any was 1992. Never had '84 Donruss, '84 Fleer Update, '89 Upper Deck and some others.

I just finished putting master sets together of this run, and was looking back on them so I thought I'd put my thoughts out there as to the relative quality of each. This is purely aesthetics - print runs, errors, rookies, inserts (with one exception) don't factor in.

For each year I rank each set lowest to highest:

1981:
3. Donruss - abysmal stock, lackluster design
2. Fleer - pretty darn good first entry - nice design
1. Topps - a classic "baseball card" baseball card set - teams easily sortable because of the little caps and brightly colored borders (a theme which will repeat). Also, at 726, still the greatest card variety.

1982:
3. Fleer - the images, the design and those robin's egg blue backs are just terrible.
2. Topps - not a fan of the design, and there seems to be a drop off in image quality.
1. Donruss - a heck of an improvement over 81, nice sharp design and good overall images.

1983:
3. Fleer - Nothing says collecting fun like drab, tan borders. Also I prefer nice, clean white borders generally.
2. Donruss - wait...aren't these the 1982 Donruss cards? Has anyone actually seen them in the same place at the same time? Lack of imagination, although still strong for the same reasons as 1982.
1. Topps - one of my favorite Topps sets; nice image selection and really nice, colorful design; love the mug shot

1984:
3. Fleer - Meh.
2. Donruss - nice design, but I really like the Topps set.
1. Topps - Another of my favorite designs from my time collecting it as a kid - bold team names along the end, not as good mug shots as 1983, good images.

1985:
3. Donruss - HATE dark-bordered cards, where background patterns repeat from card to card (the horizontal lines). Makes it hard to sort by team, which was a big deal when opening packs.
2. Fleer - Drab gray borders; colorful insets are nice.
1. Topps - Not a huge fan, but better than the others; like the bold team name on the diagonal block.

1986:
3. Donruss - see 1985 Donruss.
2. Topps - A few nice looking cards, but not an overall well-executed design. Lots of slightly fuzzy images.
1. Fleer - Best of a weak lot; Normally don't like these sorts of borders, but 86 was a down year.

1987:
3. Donruss - see 1986 Donruss
2. Topps - Woodgrain is a nice touch, but not enough to offset otherwise drab design and continued image problems. And still way too many paint jobs this late in the 80s.
1. Fleer - sleek Blue/White transition, nice stock, appreciate the colored lines at the bottom with the logos. Even the non-glossy versions LOOK high end.

1988:
4. Donruss - see 1987 Donruss
3. Fleer - The lines in the background make everything so busy it's hard sort quickly by team
2. Topps - without Score this'd be #1 - always loved the design.
1. Score - great stock, great photos, love the backs

1989:
5. Fleer - AGAIN with the Gray, this time with busy vertical lines.
4. Donruss - You know the drill
3. Topps - Love the design; not a fan of no positions on the front. Some very good images to offset some lousy ones.
2. Score - Poor Score - for one brief shining moment they were the best.
1. Upper Deck - Obviously, for all the same reasons others would say.

1990:
5. Donruss - a confused, confusing mess
4. Topps - The set has grown on me over the years, but would have been better had the multi-colored borders been keyed to teams (same comment on 1975 Topps), and still WAY too many paint jobs!
3. Score - A step backward on the design.
2. Upper Deck - Wait...WHAT? Still a nice set, though.
1. Fleer - I've always loved this simple, neat design.

1991:
5. Donruss - See 1990 Donruss et al...
4. Fleer - Yellow...just, yellow.
3. Topps - they really missed the 40th Anniversary boat - great design in concept, but in execution far too many grainy, unattractive images
2. Score - without the colored borders this would be my number one, over Upper Deck, which for all it's beauty doesn't seem to be trying that hard.
1. Upper Deck - a nice set sure, but see above.

1992:
5. Topps - What were they thinking with that stock? and those grainy, distorted stadium images on the backs? Eww...
4. Donruss - Nice white borders, but every card in the set has the same basic design and color scheme...
3. Fleer - Almost put this one higher. Don't like the lack of differentiation between teams, but that White/Green design really shines.
2. Upper Deck - really nice, but still not a lot of original thought into the set's overall content.
1. Score - love the white borders, the fantastic backs, and the imagination which went into all the subsets - it's easy for us to dismiss the cartoonish images of the all stars today, but after ripping a few boxes recently, I could really appreciate them. Also - the 90s Impact Player insert set is beautiful - reminds me of ProSet cards.

Anyway - thoughts?