View Single Post
  #22  
Old 06-18-2012, 05:35 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,388
Default

The jury didn't decide he didn't use steroids though. They decided it wasn't proven he lied about using steroids. There's a big difference. It's hard to prove someone lied about something you can't prove without a doubt they did.

The point of the Mitchell Report was both to inform baseball what was going on and to inform the fans of what their favorite players have been up to. If you refuse to acknowledge any of the report's information because it can't be proven, then I think you are missing the point. At the same token you can't prove anyone didn't use steroids.

Last edited by packs; 06-18-2012 at 05:37 PM.
Reply With Quote