[Archive]

Posted By: Joann

I guess I assume that because it is a 33 Goudey Laj that PSA actually did take more time with it. I think that's a pretty good assumption, and in that case the grade is intentional and not an individual's oversight.

I don't know if I'd go so high as a 5, but if SGC got ahold of it and gave it the usual 1.5 or 2 I think that would be a worse miss that PSA giving it a 5. Everyone agrees it's a gorgeous card - why put it in the same grade level as a high-end beater because of a minor blemish on the back?

If this is an intentional grade then good for PSA. It might not be dead on, but it definitely plays to common sense more than SGC hammering it.

J