Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Interesting question of burden of proof. Is the burden to show it does exist, or to show that it does not exist?
|
Peter - When it comes to putting cards on a list of "confirmed" examples and publishing those list to the hobby to be used as credible information the burden absolutely falls on proving the card does exist.
The lists I use have a tremendous amount of cards on them that are listed as "possible" but not confirmed.
It's difficult to say with any certainty that a front/back combo will not show up but it is possible, but great care should be take when making those claims and you should be open to the idea you could be proven wrong someday.
Again when claiming the card as "confirmed" as in this case, the burden of proof falls on proving it does exist.