View Single Post
  #10  
Old 03-04-2021, 09:54 AM
Fuddjcal Fuddjcal is offline
Chuck Tapia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,084
Default interesting. similar with my SGC 1.5

When I purchased it from a photo, the horizontal crease wasn't very noticeable. Once I scanned it with the cheap scanner HP 3-1 (don't have the pics anymore), you could see it night and day.

Picture 1 is the original I purchased:

2nd is a rescan with the epson V600, which is supposed to be good? I wish I could get the colors to "POP" like the scans above????? who knows how? I spent 3 months scanning 800 cards

I'm very happy with the card. I like the way it's jammed into the holder with the worn rounded corners. That's the way I remember them. Certainly wouldn't pay 9K for it today, OUCHIE!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth 144 SGC 20 1.5 A.jpg (76.9 KB, 211 views)
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth 144 SGC 20 1.5 B.jpg (76.8 KB, 209 views)
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth 144 A.jpg (75.6 KB, 209 views)
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth 144 B.jpg (79.8 KB, 210 views)
Reply With Quote