This one sold last night:
Van Oeyen Jack Johnson Photo
Because the image was curiously poor for a Van Oeyen (in my opinion), I looked to see if there were other photos by Van Oeyen, of Jack Johnson. I found this one, which is incredibly clear and apparently of much higher quality:
LOC Van Oeyen Jack Johnson Photo
The Van Oeyen stamp on the first one looks good, and the handwriting compares exactly to other Van Oeyen images from other years, all making me think the Hake's photo is a Type 1 Van Oeyen. Why the disparity in image quality?
Just wondering.
Edited to add: Here's a 1931 Van Oeyen with the same handwriting on the back as the 1914 Jack Johnson from the Hakes auction:
1931 Van Oeyen of Ruth