View Single Post
  #57  
Old 08-11-2022, 06:59 AM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by benjulmag View Post
Bingo!

I have seen 7s with such horrible photo contrast that if it was the last card I needed to complete a set, I would not want to buy it. Or how about an 8 with grossly toned brown borders that make it painful to look at? Yet, it seems nobody takes issue with the correctness of the technical grades assigned to those cards. But show some minor wear on the corners, the card gets downgraded by a degree IMO grossly disproportionate to the attractiveness of the card, which is what I thought TPG is supposed to capture.
The answer is simple technical
Grade isn’t eye appeal. Every flaw isn’t weighted equally come on Corey you know this. You just seem to want to argue on this thread. You almost sound like me. Lol.that said I think this card is a 3.5 but a pretty 3.5

Last edited by glynparson; 08-11-2022 at 07:00 AM.
Reply With Quote