Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
I just love stupid comments like this saying absolutely nothing to prove anything. 
"That is exactly why ERA is a better judge of pitcher effectiveness. Thanks for proving yourself wrong."
Exactly WTF does "that" mean. Once again, no evidence, logic, facts, proof, etc., and nothing to even show exactly what statements or comments they are supposedly referencing to or disagreeing with. And what exactly was it that was proven wrong? Just another typical, "I'm right, and you're wrong." argument by those that prove or say absolutely nothing. |
Bob, the sad part is you believe your incoherent ramblings to be actual arguments stating facts. If you read my post about 1988 and Joe Magrane and David Cone, you would see what I am talking about.
You talk about wins defining a pitchers effectiveness, then you talk about unearned runs?
You get defensive when people disagree with you. You ignore when others present evidence, then claim that they never presented evidence in the first place. Then you play the victim?