Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
Christopher, Thanks but I was quoting a previous response to one of my posts - I guess I needed to telegraph my intent.
Originally asked in the very first post: "I wanted to know if it looks ok to people who have more expertise in this."
The conversation took a turn from 'LOOKING' at the signatures, to evaluating the legitimacy of the paper documentation. I think that's a backwards way of doing things. I might have missed something, but after Barry and I posted the first two responses, I don't think anyone else ever said anything about the actual signatures. On the other hand, there were several who have much more experience than me in evaluating signatures, who chose instead to evaluate the paper. Curious.
|
To the original poster.... I think the sigs are legit. Just my opinion.