[Archive]

Posted By: Dan Bretta

Like Jay, Lee and I have already said, none of us would have given this an A-10. I would have given it an A-9 based on Henrich's age and the fact that he really has never mentioned the bat before. But with all that said and having read Henrich's book and having done futher research on Henrich in other sources I could find nothing anywhere where you could question the man's integrity. I think the biggest problem that I have with the bat is that it was repaired and Henrich doesn't remember who repaired it for him. The bat is still plausible to me because it matches factory records, and you have Henrich's word. It's just not what I consider to be "rock solid" provenance.