I have no idea who printed the Obacks I just said it was mentioned that Schmidt did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
We have gone thru this numerous times in past threads over the years.
You cannot compare Schmidt Lithographic's (San Francisco) printing methods and machinery used to produce the OBAK's with
American Lithographic's (NYC) printing methods & machinery that produced the T206's, T205's, T209's, T210's, T211's, T213's,
T214's and T215's.
Where is your evidence that supports you making this claim ?
Furthermore, mathematically speaking, tell us how your "17" (or whatever) format maps into the following T206 structures ? ?
150 Series
-------------
150-only group = 12 subjects
150/350 series = 144 subjects
350-only series = 204 subjects
------------------
350/460 series = 60 subjects....plus the 6 super-prints (which were usually Double-Printed)
------------------
460-only series
------------------
Exclusive 12 group = 12 subjects
Subjects printed only with 460 type backs = 36
Southern Lgrs. = 48 subjects
-----------------
Hey guys............
It does not require Rocket Science to see that the common denominator in all these Series structures is a factor of 12.
TED Z
.
|
Good luck with your panels.