Quote:
Originally Posted by bounce
"can we do it constructively" probably isn't the best phrasing. Just saying...
This discussion has been going on for decades now? It isn't "new", it's just become more common in the recent weeks, and more public.
|
David sorry I'm going to make an example of your response.
Nothing in what you say is constructive or added value to this topic.
To throw your hands up and say it's been going on for decades and that TPG's cannot follow similar standards as other industries is just wrong.
You say it's been known for years, its been talked about for decades, its part of the hobby since the beginning, there are already "restored" flips available. So does the hobby keep going in the direction that it is?
The stubborn mentality that fears change will always fall behind.
As I said before similar parallels to the comic industry years ago about this subject. Now that CGC recognizes conservation/restoration fully and has their own "tenets" there is nothing taboo about the subject.
If CGC can do this then it would appear to be a less intrusive process for PSA or SGC to follow in analyzing a simple card that is not as "elaborate" as a comic book right?
The point of my thread is to call out what's been done by similar hobby grading methodologies where things like pressing, cleaning, color touch, identifying trim etc. are part of conservation or restoration.
Again if CGC can do it with books there is absolutely no reason PSA or SGC could not do it on a card.