Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan
Any logical person would come to the conclusion that it's a photocopy of the original. There's no way that every nuance of the original signature could be perfectly replicated in that fashion.
So for me, it comes down to a semantics issue (or an interpretation of PSA's wording).
|
this! it's a xerox, but psa can't really say so because it would hurt their rep and open themselves up for more xerox'ed submissions in the future (that they might deem authentic).
you guys trying every which way to reason so donavon would send out the cut is pretty funny. it's not a great loss to the hobby if destroyed. we will not gain any more knowledge by examining the piece. you guys just want to catch psa so bad in what you perceive is some conspiracy and deception, but like perezfan said it's just a game of semantics. let it go, there's been no big cover-up like you guys have hinted all thread.