View Single Post
  #11  
Old 05-19-2022, 08:54 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4reals View Post
I just can’t see 1988 Topps not being considered vintage almost 35 years after it was produced.
When I started collecting in 1986, cards from the '50s and '60s (and even early '70s) were considered vintage to most collectors and dealers (and most of these cards weren't even 35 years old in 1988).

So, if you apply that same logic today, I agree that 1988 Topps could (and should) be considered vintage. Mass production should have nothing to do with whether they are considered vintage or not. If a new discovery of 1 million T206 cards hits the market, are they any less vintage just because they're more plentiful?
Reply With Quote