Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
-1
You cite an article that explains Carroll's coaching philosophy and then you say not everyone understands it? 
Well, if they read the article, they should understand it, right?
http://seattletimes.com/html/seahawk...awks03xml.html
So now my statement is even MORE true: "I just think it's hypocritical (not you) for anybody (Seattle fan or not) to say one call was good and the other call was bad when the article (according to Pete Carroll) said that both calls were born from the same philosophy." |
David, you baffle me. Okay, here you go:
EVERYONE WHO HAS READ THE ARTICLE ABOUT PETE CARROLL'S COACHING PHILOSOPHY AND WHO UNDERSTANDS IT, YET STILL THINKS THAT ONE PLAY WAS STUPID AND THE OTHER WAS SMART, AND WHO AGREES THAT THEY WOULD PREFER THAT PETE CARROLL CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT HIS COACHING AND PLAY-CALLING PHILOSOPHY AS OPPOSED TO THEIR OWN.....
......IS A HYPOCRITE.
Will that do? Because I would agree that the above (all caps stuff) is true.
But quite frankly, I really don't care if some Seattle fans are hypocrites or not. All the ones I've run into have been quite pleasant, and I think we could use more of that and less of the bashing;i.e-let them be. They are miserable - isn't that enough for you?