That brings me to yet another question Ted. I often see you basing the relative scarcity of different backs as a function of how many confirmed subjects can be found on each. This would only be accurate if the actual print runs of the 2 different backs were identical, correct? For example, lets assume there are 60 known subjects with Uzit backs, and 40 or so known subjects with RH backs. If there were 100 of each of those Uzit players printed, and 300 of each of the RH's printed, obviously a random RH back would be far more common than an Uzit back. Does my reasoning make any sense to you?
|