Quote:
Originally Posted by packs
I’m glad we’re talking about facts. All the way back on May 31 the players wanted to play 114 games with no salary cuts. The owners wouldn’t agree to terms. On June 1 the owners said they would pay a prorated salary for a 50 game season so they could save money. There’s your concrete example of not wanting to pay people to work.
|
Do you seriously not understand the difference between a pay cut or prorated salary and not paying people? The owners wanting to pay them less is entirely different from your claim that they tried not to pay people who are working (which is federally illegal even). This is the stupidest conversation we could possibly have. Good luck to you.