View Single Post
  #26  
Old 06-12-2021, 02:52 PM
bigfanNY bigfanNY is online now
Jonathan Sterling
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldeboo View Post
What would you think if General Gum was a direct and known subsidiary of Curtiss Candy?
If General gum were a subsidiary of Curtiss then all you would need is proof that they had a license to issue R310's to state with any certinly that they did. Something like the cardboard R310 Butterfinger box toppers.
But why would Curtiss compete against itself. Especially a key product like the Butterfinger bar? The sign says 2 sticks of gum for a penny plus a card. Sound like something a company trying to dig itself out of bankruptcy would do?
Reply With Quote