NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:20 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default poor 1933 goudey ruth opinion

1933 goudey ruth
Bought it 15 years ago at card
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ruth.jpg (34.3 KB, 379 views)

Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:48 AM. Reason: resize and turn scan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:21 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default back

Show
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ruthb.jpg (35.0 KB, 376 views)

Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:49 AM. Reason: scan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:32 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

lol....damn
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:43 PM
vintagesportscollector's Avatar
vintagesportscollector vintagesportscollector is offline
Joe
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,350
Default

The Babe always looked better from behind anyway.
__________________
-Joe
www.iyellcornell.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2016, 02:32 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,269
Default

Worth about the same real or fake!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:17 PM
BBB BBB is offline
Bryan
Bryan Bossa.rd
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: California
Posts: 166
Default poor 1933 goudey ruth opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by ullmandds View Post
Worth about the same real or fake!!!


I'd wager someone would still pay $20-$30 if it were real.

Last edited by BBB; 03-27-2016 at 03:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:24 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBB View Post
I'd wager someone would still pay $20-$30 if it were real.
Like i said...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:29 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,709
Default

If real, because it is a Goudey Babe, my guess is it would fetch at least $100. The card's back looks possibly legit, but the front scan is just too blurry to make a virtual judgement.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:38 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default goudey ruth

Pic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ruth2.jpg (35.2 KB, 370 views)

Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:51 AM. Reason: scan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:40 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default pic

Pic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ruth3.jpg (34.1 KB, 374 views)

Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:54 AM. Reason: scan size
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-27-2016, 03:51 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default goudey ruth

Not for sale but fyi PSA 0 go for $1200
$20? Wow
I wish could another one for that price.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2016, 04:05 PM
mrmopar mrmopar is offline
Curt
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,576
Default

A poor condition Ruth may sell in the $1200 range if it presents well. I have been watching the 181 over the last several months and poor copies routinely break $1K, but they look great for the grade. I don't know how well that version sells because I am not interested in it, but although I don't doubt someone would pay $100 for one that bad, I am not sure why. Isn't one of the allures of a baseball card the appearance? I suppose filling a hole for a set is one reason, but jeez...
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2016, 04:15 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,269
Default

My comment was made somewhat in jest as reprints routinely sell for a few hundred $.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2016, 04:39 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

There are different levels of PSA 1's. That being said, this card won't 1. It would set record low for "authentic" if it is real.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2016, 04:51 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default Ruth

I trust the dealer I got it from 15 years ago.
PSA 0
goes for $1200 with 25 watching.
I will send to grading one day will show a lot nicer .
I have examined with my goudey cards and 100%.
$100? more like $750 but again not selling
happy easter
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2016, 05:53 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,914
Default

750 sounds pretty high to me in an authentic holder. 200-300 would be my guess. There is too much paper loss on the front for much more than that.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:01 PM
Bruinsfan94 Bruinsfan94 is offline
Brian clif.ford
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 223
Default

If you could get 200-300$ I'd take it and never look back.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:10 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,709
Default Money schmoney

Ok, how much for this authentic Ruth? It is obviously missing huge chunks and is actually in two pieces, but in my opinion it displays a lot nicer than the one posted. We all had a nice laugh when I have posted this in the past...it is not all about the money.

As a side question, I wonder how much someone would pay for my Diamond Stars Hornsby with the blank front?

Brian
Attached Images
File Type: jpg baberuthgoudey003.jpg (76.7 KB, 418 views)
File Type: jpg horriblehornsby558.jpg (81.3 KB, 422 views)
File Type: jpg horriblehornsby559.jpg (76.5 KB, 428 views)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:32 PM
bcornell bcornell is offline
Ⓑⓘⓛⓛ Ⓒⓞⓡⓝⓔⓛⓛ
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SJC
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardcards View Post
I will send to grading one day will show a lot nicer .
That is staggeringly dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:45 PM
Bruinsfan94 Bruinsfan94 is offline
Brian clif.ford
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianp-beme View Post
Ok, how much for this authentic Ruth? It is obviously missing huge chunks and is actually in two pieces, but in my opinion it displays a lot nicer than the one posted. We all had a nice laugh when I have posted this in the past...it is not all about the money.

As a side question, I wonder how much someone would pay for my Diamond Stars Hornsby with the blank front?

Brian
Yea I agree that is much nicer because you can actually see the Babes face & body. I think the only way someone would buy that Hornsby would be to use it for some kind of shady purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:50 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 View Post
If you could get 200-300$ I'd take it and never look back.
Agreed!! I was thinking $40 was too much!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-27-2016, 07:14 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcornell View Post
That is staggeringly dumb.
That's a little harsh. If there is enough of the card left to grade I would send it in. I'm sure it's worth more graded as raw there is more of a question of authenticity.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-27-2016, 07:20 PM
bcornell bcornell is offline
Ⓑⓘⓛⓛ Ⓒⓞⓡⓝⓔⓛⓛ
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SJC
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
That's a little harsh. If there is enough of the card left to grade I would send it in. I'm sure it's worth more graded as raw there is more of a question of authenticity.
Please. If you put garbage in a holder, it doesn't "show nicer" and it isn't "worth more".
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-27-2016, 07:22 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcornell View Post
Please. If you put garbage in a holder, it doesn't "show nicer" and it isn't "worth more".
Depends on the holder.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-27-2016, 08:19 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,709
Default Babe in the shade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 View Post
Yea I agree that is much nicer because you can actually see the Babes face & body. I think the only way someone would buy that Hornsby would be to use it for some kind of shady purpose.
When I previously posted the Ruth, someone commented that they never knew the Babe had such an hourglass figure.

And scammers take note...the Hornsby is not for sale! The only shady purpose I intend for it involves using it as a coaster while resting in a hammock.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-28-2016, 03:03 AM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default opinion

I asked for opinions not insults
Thanks Billy. Im dumb and card is garbage.
Brain like ur ruth i think its awesome card.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-28-2016, 04:49 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardcards View Post
I asked for opinions not insults
Thanks Billy. Im dumb and card is garbage.
Brain like ur ruth i think its awesome card.
Didn't mean to insult. You implied it was a $750-$1200 card though. That is ludicrous.

Last edited by bobbyw8469; 03-28-2016 at 04:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:04 AM
7nohitter's Avatar
7nohitter 7nohitter is offline
Member
And.rew Mil.ler
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 1,526
Default

I would love to some day add a Ruth to my '33 collection, and condition is not an issue for me. HOWEVER, I wouldn't go more than $25 for that filler.

I would extremely surprised, even if holdered, this card fetched more than $75.
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:38 AM
IronHorse2130 IronHorse2130 is offline
Ben L
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 631
Default

This one recently sold on eBay for $650

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-GOUDEY-...p2047675.l2557

It has a very nice front with a back that has been destroyed. Based on this and similar sales I don't think it is realistic to expect $750 or more for your example.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:18 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronHorse2130 View Post
This one recently sold on eBay for $650

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-GOUDEY-...p2047675.l2557

It has a very nice front with a back that has been destroyed. Based on this and similar sales I don't think it is realistic to expect $750 or more for your example.
You are insane. At least you can see the front on that one. How many people only look at the backs of cards and completely ignore the front?? ZERO. At least on the other example you can see the front. If you were filling it pages of a binder, that slot would be filled, and you can SEE it is a Babe Ruth card. On the OP's example, I have no idea WHO it is!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:28 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
You are insane. At least you can see the front on that one. How many people only look at the backs of cards and completely ignore the front?? ZERO. At least on the other example you can see the front. If you were filling it pages of a binder, that slot would be filled, and you can SEE it is a Babe Ruth card. On the OP's example, I have no idea WHO it is!

I think Ben was attempting to say the same as you, he was not backing up the OP's opinion. He was offering a good example of a poor card to state the value was unrealistic.

Personally, I like well presenting poor cards and that example that Ben posted would be a great one for a low budget collector who wanted a Ruth. If it was displayed, no one would know the better. The OPs card ( and I am only being honest, no insult meant) I likely would not put more than 10 bucks toward and that would be just to give it to my son for fun. It has no presentation worth at all.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:47 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
I think Ben was attempting to say the same as you, he was not backing up the OP's opinion. He was offering a good example of a poor card to state the value was unrealistic.

Personally, I like well presenting poor cards and that example that Ben posted would be a great one for a low budget collector who wanted a Ruth. If it was displayed, no one would know the better. The OPs card ( and I am only being honest, no insult meant) I likely would not put more than 10 bucks toward and that would be just to give it to my son for fun. It has no presentation worth at all.
Yea...I misread his. My bad. At least we are all in agreement.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:49 AM
Bestdj777 Bestdj777 is offline
Chris
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardcards View Post
I trust the dealer I got it from 15 years ago.
PSA 0
goes for $1200 with 25 watching.
I will send to grading one day will show a lot nicer .
I have examined with my goudey cards and 100%.
$100? more like $750 but again not selling
happy easter
I am really confused. You know this card is authentic, and you know what the card is worth. What would you like an opinion on?
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get
Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend)
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:52 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,269
Default

all cards presented are nicer and more valuable than that of the op. just because the op purchased a likely authentic beat to piss goudey ruth years ago for likely a song...the op shouldn't take it as an insult...unless he purposely made the card this way...that this card is not very valuable.

it is what it is.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-28-2016, 07:12 AM
Bpm0014's Avatar
Bpm0014 Bpm0014 is offline
Brendan Mullen
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,858
Default

The guy who owns the $25 card in question here, and the guy that bought the $650 Ruth card with back damage on Ebay (2 threads above).........should get together and put BOTH cards in a holder back to back. Nice front, nice back. Problem solved! You're welcome....

Last edited by Bpm0014; 03-28-2016 at 07:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-28-2016, 07:19 AM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default No way $750

Sorry but all Authentic grades are not valued the same. I honestly think you could get $300-$400 for the card in a
pSA or SGC authentic holder but it would not be an easy sell.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-28-2016, 08:00 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,478
Default

As in the other mistake you made, is your name Billy? Now I see why you couldn't see a thread that was in front of your eyes for 4 days. No big deal but you either need to slow down or speed up or something. PS...I think the OPs card goes for $223.50 in auction (if it went to auction).

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
Didn't mean to insult. You implied it was a $750-$1200 card though. That is ludicrous.
__________________
Leon Luckey

Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 08:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-28-2016, 08:10 AM
vintagesportscollector's Avatar
vintagesportscollector vintagesportscollector is offline
Joe
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpm0014 View Post
The guy who owns the $25 card in question here, and the guy that bought the $650 Ruth card with back damage on Ebay (2 threads above).........should get together and put BOTH cards in a holder back to back. Nice front, nice back. Problem solved! You're welcome....
Seriously, that's actually a really good observation. If I had the $650 Ruth, I would pay a premium (not $750, but something more than $25, $100?? maybe), just to get the clean back. That would be a cool display seeing front and back together side-by-side. In this case the whole (or two halves) would be greater than the sum of the parts.
__________________
-Joe
www.iyellcornell.com
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-28-2016, 08:19 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
As in the other mistake you made, is your name Billy? Now I see why you couldn't see a thread that was in front of your eyes for 4 days. No big deal but you either need to slow down or speed up or something. PS...I think the OPs card goes for $223.50 in auction (if it went to auction).
Not really a mistake. I never got emails. You said I got them. Well, I didn't. You said I did though, so I'll take the hit and say I got them. My mistake. You can call me Billy.

PS....put me down for $20 on the UNDER....as long as it is a legit auction with no shilling or anything nefarious going on.

Last edited by bobbyw8469; 03-28-2016 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-28-2016, 08:20 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagesportscollector View Post
Seriously, that's actually a really good observation. If I had the $650 Ruth, I would pay a premium (not $750, but something more than $25, $100?? maybe), just to get the clean back. That would be a cool display seeing front and back together side-by-side. In this case the whole (or two halves) would be greater than the sum of the parts.
Agreed. Would make a good display piece in a frame or something. That is the ONLY way I would be interested in that card.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-28-2016, 08:24 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,478
Default

So Richards name is now Billy? I guess my name is Stan and you can be Steve.

I never said you got emails, Bobby. I doubt you did (though from what I see on the board you might have missed them if they were in front of your face.) It's not a big deal I was just pointing out you don't tend to see things in front of you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
Not really a mistake. I never got emails. You said I got them. Well, I didn't. You said I did though, so I'll take the hit and say I got them. My mistake. You can call me Billy.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-28-2016, 10:02 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,054
Default

You can call me Al. Just don't call me late for dinner. God, I wish I owned a Goudey Ruth right about now! :-p
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-28-2016, 02:46 PM
hangman62 hangman62 is offline
Ralph Gee
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,358
Default ruth

front looks good
back is a reprint
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:07 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default Ruth

Im not worried about the money but
I know its worth at least $500 some people see garbage I see a beautiful ruth card that's not for sale
thanks and good luck to all
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:19 PM
Bliggity's Avatar
Bliggity Bliggity is offline
Dan Bl@u
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardcards View Post
Im not worried about the money but
I know its worth at least $500 some people see garbage I see a beautiful ruth card that's not for sale
thanks and good luck to all
Well, we're five pages deep now and we still don't know what you want an opinion on. Was there a question here? If the question is one of value, not a single person has agreed with your estimate, yet you still "know it's worth at least $500." Why ask for opinions if you know the answer already and aren't interested in listening to opinions?

ETA: I realize these are largely rhetorical questions at this point
__________________
Recovering Relapsed set collector.

Last edited by Bliggity; 03-28-2016 at 05:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:33 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default goudey

yes I asked for opinions but not anymore since I get estimates of $10 and $25
and insults that my card is garbage.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-28-2016, 05:43 PM
Bruinsfan94 Bruinsfan94 is offline
Brian clif.ford
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 223
Default

So you want opinions as long as they agree with you? I'm not sure if the card is real and even if it was, does anyone think that one of the big three would holder it? If it is real I think it would go for over 20$ for people who want a filler or a real Ruth. A Goudey Ruth with a much better picture, though trimmed, went for like 375 last month.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:06 PM
richardcards richardcards is offline
Ricardo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 736
Default Ruth

im no longer interested in any opnions.
Ive put away my gem ruth for good.
thank u
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-28-2016, 06:32 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardcards View Post
im no longer interested in any opnions.
Ive put away my gem ruth for good.
thank u
That sounds like it is for the best. I doubt anyone will ever appreciate that card as much as you do.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-28-2016, 07:02 PM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
That sounds like it is for the best. I doubt anyone will ever appreciate that card as much as you do.
I've been formulating my opinion for a couple of days and now just when I am ready to pull the trigger, I am too late. Shucks!!!
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number


Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed in 2012-24.
Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served.
If you want fries with your order, just speak up.
Thank you all.



Now nearly PQ.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB 1933 Goudey Ruth #53 - Poor/Fair Graded 25801wv 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 08-05-2015 06:48 PM
WTB Poor Grade 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth g&m sales 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 12-13-2014 12:36 PM
FS: 33 Goudey Ruth and 34 Goudey Gehrig in poor condition sylbry 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 3 06-22-2014 11:56 AM
WBT-TTTF 1933 Goudey #144 Babe Ruth Poor- scans of trade bait included frankh8147 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 01-12-2013 11:56 AM
Napoleon (Larry) Lajoie 1933 Goudey POOR (not ruth) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 04-29-2004 08:18 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 AM.


ebay GSB