|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Justin Brooks
I was wondering , in your opinions, what is the best holders for cards. Im looking to complete some post 1950 sets. The more expensive cards, i will have PSA graded, so thats easy, whats the best idea for the rest of the set(s)? Albums? Boxes? individuals? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Jason L
just email me and I can tell you where to ship them! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: davidcycleback
Hard to beat top loader and penny sleeves. If a set is is less expensive and lower condition than deserving that treatment, those less rigid holders are good-- forget their name. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Paul S
I'm a penny sleeve and toploader person myself, for the more "precious" of my cards, or for older post-war in general. For others I put them in penny sleeves. Everything is then put in a card box. Like David, I'm wary of plastic binder sleeves, although I actually do have some that way (I put them into penny sleeves first) -- still, I'm thinking of scrapping that method altogether. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Mark
Agreed on the penny sleeve and semi-rigid holder. But if the card is worth more than $100 in my collection, it goes to Beckett for grading. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: boxingcardman
I use Unikeep's clamshell all polypropylene albums. I use 4-pocket sheets to hold the card savers. It takes 3-4 albums to hold a larger set but I love the way they display, they are quite secure for browsing, and the albums take up very little space compared with standard albums because there isn't a thick ring system and oversized flaps to bulk it out. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Jason L
certainly beats my bicycle spokes from when I was younger! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Paul S
certainly beats my bicycle spokes from when I was younger! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: boxingcardman
I used to use this system, tightly packed in boxes. My collection rode out the 1994 Northridge earthquake without any damage that way. However, as I've migrated the cards out of the toploaders and into card savers I have found a few cards with hairline vertical creases at their tops from where the openings of the top loaders bow. I'd not recommend using them. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: boxingcardman
deleted |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Best Holder for cards
Posted By: Paul S
Thanks, that's good to know. I better think of something else. You're just referring to post-war size, I imagine. My vintage survived a previous earthquake there that was centered in Newhall/Saugus/Valencia area, about 1969-70 or so. I had them in a cardboard cigar box, no sleeves, no toploader, or nuttin'! Maybe best to go back to that |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone have issues with SGC holder damaging cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-11-2008 04:01 PM |
How many HOF cards will soon be in a PRO Holder? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-30-2008 05:37 PM |
a decent PSA holder for N cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-01-2006 04:32 PM |
cards in old SGC holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-05-2005 06:57 PM |
Graded Cards with Mislabeled Holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-04-2002 11:49 AM |