Now on Ebay! 1950's Brooklyn Dodgers Signed Baseball, Jackie Robinson, Campanella

[luciobar1980]

Hey guys, what's your take on this ball? PSA describes them as clubhouse signatures, but I know that doesn't mean they all are, necessarily. Which ones do you think are the real mccoy and which aren't? I feel pretty confident most are genuine but looking for some opinions.

Also, I bought it on ebay. Would you say that this listing was misleading or was it totally on me to read and understand the meaning of Clubhouse Signatures in on the PSA paper? I'm a novice when it comes to signatures, so I took a solid look and assumed these were all genuine. The PSA paper even calls them "genuine" towards the bottom, which in itself I find a little misleading. This ball is Ball #3 on the PSA letter.

Thanks for your help!

Link: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Brooklyn-Do...rdt=true&rt=nc

[yanks12025]

Messed up

[luciobar1980]

Originally Posted by yanks12025

I dont think that PSA auction letter even goes with the baseball.. Cause it lists tons more than 12 signatures and says Roy Campanella and there's no Campanella on that ball.

Id reach out to the seller about that..

I think it does actually.. the PSA letter lists 3 balls. The ball is question is ball #3. Sorry, should have mentioned that.

[luciobar1980]

Also, the link appears down at the moment but I did find that the ball sold as part of the George S. Hipp Collection in 2002. That auction included all 3 balls listed on the PSA letter, mine being ball #3.

[yanks12025]

Originally Posted by luciobar1980

I think it does actually.. the PSA letter lists 3 balls. The ball is question is ball #3. Sorry, should have mentioned that.

Yep you're correct, I skipped over that part. Either way I think the title should still have said clubhouse ball instead of saying original

[Joe Hunter]

I think there is enough ambiguity in the description that I would send it back. I don’t think you would have a problem with EBay not siding with you in the event the seller balks at accepting the return. The fact that he says “no returns accepted” really means nothing.

[khkco4bls]

Campanella is on that ball. But I don't like the Jackie Robinson

[luciobar1980]

Originally Posted by Joe Hunter

I think there is enough ambiguity in the description that I would send it back. I don’t think you would have a problem with EBay not siding with you in the event the seller balks at accepting the return. The fact that he says “no returns accepted” really means nothing.

Yeah, it's kind of odd that eBay even allows sellers, at this point, to say they don't accept returns.