|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Starting up a New Set
I just completed my 1966 set and got a little worn out from the high numbers and SPs. I have already completed 1965 and 1968. I have decided to take an easier route on my next set and am currently deciding between 1964 and 1969.
I already have a few 1964s (about 72) but seem to see 1969 cards a little more frequently available at low prices in higher grade condition. Are there any factors to consider that may not be readily apparent? I have read reviews that both are generally considered easy to assemble. I have attached a few pictures of the 1966 for viewing. Last edited by sfh24; 11-18-2018 at 06:43 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Between the 1964 and 1969 sets, I love the 1969 set. Reggie Jackson rookie card and Mantle's last card. Iconic Johnny Bench card. The card is uncluttered with rich colors. One of my favorite sets.
I don't know how old you are, but have you considered a set from the year you were born?
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Here are a couple of random thoughts. Overall, the 1969 set is beautiful and vibrant (an autograph collector's dream), and the lack of problematic high numbers makes completing it a heckuva lot easier than some other years. On the downside, Topps reused so many images from previous years and there is a ridiculously large number of capless or airbrushed cap head shots. 1964 has a 'hidden' problem that a lot of people sort of forget about. Not only do you have to find nice looking fronts, but you also need to pay particular attention to the backs of the cards to avoid picking up ones that have been scratched off, so to speak.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Shon-- congrats on finishing 1966. The cards you posted are gorgeous... and unencumbered by plastic prisons
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-19-2018 at 07:24 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, always in the binder.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Nice sharp corners on those '66s. Very cool. I have never been able to bring myself to pay that much for a Gaylord Perry card, LOL.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Bowman / Topps Cubs team sets. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Paying for the Perry was much easier than coughing up the price for cards such as "Choo Choo Coleman, Horace Clarke, Tigers/Twins team card, and Grant Jackson". Last edited by sfh24; 11-20-2018 at 01:45 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Would agree with you that is a good price for Gaylord. Those who have PSA 7's and above at BIN prices on eBay want way more than that.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Bowman / Topps Cubs team sets. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
REA catalog lot - starting bid $5 | gawaintheknight | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 3 | 07-23-2017 07:58 PM |
wanted to buy--I am starting a RAW (can you believe it) g-vg set- | forazzurri2axz | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 08-20-2016 08:21 PM |
Starting to wonder. . . . . | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-23-2016 02:42 PM |
Looking for singles (starting a set) in 4, 5, and 6 | Sean1125 | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 03-29-2015 07:16 PM |
TOO STUFFY HERE - YOU WIN - STARTING MY OWN!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 12-11-2003 06:17 PM |