|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Would the Legendary Babe Ruth Still Be a Star if He Played Today?
For your reading enjoyment:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smiths...um=socialmedia I am looking forward to getting Leavy's book next year.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
He would be even better in today's watered down 30 team MLB. So many mediocre pitchers today in the majors that would have never seen the big leagues in Ruth's time. That more than makes up for the 8% of African Americans that were banned in Ruth's day or the modern day closers that Ruth might have to face one time in a game.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Not to mention the technology and quality improvement for the equipment (bats, gloves, etc.). And I'm sure the ballparks today are much simpler than the ones he played in.
__________________
Need a spreadsheet to help track your set, player run, or collection? Check out Sheets4Collectors on Etsy. https://www.etsy.com/shop/Sheets4Collectors - Hall of Famers Progress: 318/340 (93.53%) - Grover Hartley PC Needs: T207 Anonymous Factory 25 Back, 1914 New York Evening Sun Supplements, 1917 D328 Weil Baking Co., and (possibly) 1917 Merchant's Bakery - Jim Thome PC - Cleveland Indians Franchise Hall of Fame |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Of course he would, just like Jim Thorpe would run away with the Olympic decathalon, Ernie Nevers would lead the NFL in touchdowns and Johnny Weissmuller would lap Michael Phelps!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It is not hard to imagine that Owens could win a world championship today in the long jump using modern equipment and not having to train and compete in other events at the same time. Some athletes do transcend generations. It is not like modern day players have to hit off Walter Johnson. How many great athletes today are playing football or basketball, but would have chosen baseball back in Ruth's day as the nation's favorite sport? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I believe they ran on cinder tracks back in Owen's day. As a former track runner who once ran on a cinder track, I can tell you there's a bid difference. A big of an exaggeration, but it can be like running on gravel versus the sidewalk.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with rats60; I think baseball is the one sport where the stars of yesterday, who actually mastered the game's fundamentals, would be better than the stars of today.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
One of those "who would win, Batman or Superman" type questions. No right answer.
I think Ruth would be a very good player today but not the greatest of all time. He may have been Cecil Fielder or David Ortiz but probably not the record he compiled in the 20s and 30s. He saw a lot of pitchers in his day but those pitchers were not MadBum, Scherzer and Syndagaard. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I think Ruth would do fine
And so may others but I think it's wishful thinking to believe he would be better. Today's game is more than just the addition of blacks it's global and the best are more likely to be discovered and get to the bigs today then they were back then. I believe the average guy off the street in 1927 would be better than today, they played it a lot more back then, but I don't think Ruth would be putting up juiced Bonds numbers.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
One thing that's interesting about baseball is that for all the improvements in training methods and all the advances generally in terms of athletes' strength, speed and size, pitchers don't seem to be throwing any harder than they did way back in the day and hitters don't seem to be hitting balls any further. I'm not sure why that is.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Maybe it wouldn't be a power hitter like Ruth, but one of the other sharp hitters of the day who would thrive today due to their technical skills. Rogers Hornsby and Ty Cobb come to mind. Cobb obviously had running speed that would translate physically to today. Last edited by drcy; 04-24-2017 at 11:16 AM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Bottom line is with MLB not adding teams as fast as the US population grows and the large number of foreign players currently playing, Ruth's era was far more watered down talent wise than today's era. Facing more evolved pitching strategies (relief pitching), physical training ,etc, might render Ruth a comparison to Adam Dunn in today's MLB. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Does anyone honestly believe that the same amount of kids in this modern age of video games, and general on-line shenaningans play baseball? Not to mention additional sports that presently garner considerable attention that weren't as popular in those days like football, baseball, hockey...etc. Look at the WWII Beano T-13 hand grenades, made not only to simulate the size, but also the weight of a baseball, as it was expected that any and all American boys could throw a baseball. What would they fashion them after now??? Cell phones? Also, as Peter mentioned, pitchers don't seem to throw any harder now, and hitters don't seem to hit the ball any further these days.... Plus are we not forgetting the absolutely pampered lifestyle a modern athlete enjoys? As mentioned, interesting discussion, and its fun to ponder the "what ifs". |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Then consider Mark Armour's recent article about participation of Asian and Latinos in baseball and how it has grown since 1947. It shows that 70% or 525 roster spots (ONLY 125 more than in 1920) are currently held by US players versus the nearly 400 roster spots held by US players in 1920 with approx. a third of the population. Clearly, the talent in the 1920s was far more diluted then than it is now. https://sabr.org/bioproj/topic/baseb...hics-1947-2012 |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
For baseball, I believe hand-eye coordination is the key. Even though athletes have gotten bigger, stronger & faster, there's no getting by the hand-eye coordination factor. If Babe Ruth was born in 1990, he'd be 27 years old & dominating.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
But they do, don't they? Even if they don't "seem to." WaJo was probably throwing in the 90s pretty consistently over the first several innings, but not in the high 90s and not after the 5th inning. 90 mph was a serious fastball back then. And who, other than Ruth himself, hit more than a few shots beyond 450'?
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
He not only would be great today but he would b the best player in the league, yes over trout and harper. He would hit third on any team every day, except the days he pitches as the teams 1 or 2 starter.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Drumback, Mart8081, Obcmac, Tonyo, markf31, gnaz01, rainier2004, EASE, Bobsbats, Craig M, TistaT202, Seiklis, Kenny Cole, T's please, Vic, marcdelpercio, poorlydrawncat, brianp-beme, mybuddyinc, Glchen, chernieto , old-baseball , Donscards, Centauri, AddieJoss, T2069bk,206fix, joe v, smokelessjoe, eggoman, botn, canjond Looking for T205's or anything Babe Ruth...email or PM me if you have any to sell. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I'd love to see how Mike Trout would hit with a 46+ ounce bat against a 90+ mph fastball. Even an 80+ mph fastball would be interesting.
__________________
Buying Kansas CDVs, Cabinets, RPPCs and other pre 1930 memorabilia. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100 years ago today, Babe Ruth made his Major League Debut | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-15-2014 11:06 AM |
How popular is Babe Ruth today | billyb | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 01-26-2014 08:12 AM |
99 years ago today (7/11/14)....Babe Ruth's debut....show your Ruth stuff | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 88 | 07-20-2013 06:32 PM |
1929 Star Player Babe Ruth SGC 10-sold | sycks22 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-12-2013 09:25 PM |
Babe Ruth as played by Max Gail (was Casey Stengel as played by Charles Durning) | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 6 | 02-15-2006 07:31 PM |