|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll start it off with the guy who got closest to 300 without acheiving it.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
264 wins
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know nothing about this fellow Moyer.
But, the Count could have well surpassed 284 wins, if he'd settled for less cabbage.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 19th century win totals aren't meaningful on a straightforward comparison, given that it was not unusual for pitchers to start 50 plus games a year. Keefe started 60+ twice, and Clarkson started 70+ twice.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's a pair.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pete,
I absolutely agree. As much as we like to romanticize 19th century baseball, it isn't comparable to what we now know that game to be. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unfortunately my cards are locked up, but you can add Ted Lyons and Red Ruffing to the list.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's okay Jim, My wife does the same thing when I don't do enough around here also.
|
![]() |
|
|