|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: It is.... | |||
| trimmed. |
|
28 | 45.16% |
| not trimmed. |
|
23 | 37.10% |
| can't tell from the scan, |
|
11 | 17.74% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Someone stated it is trimmed do to a dog earred left top corner. I don't see it so I thought I would ask my friends here if you see it.
Buyer is keeping the card and is happy with it. I did offer a full refund plus his shipping back to me regardless of what Calvindog says!! ![]() http://www.ebay.com/itm/281045697463 Last edited by danmckee; 01-15-2013 at 06:02 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I added a poll for you Dan. I voted I can't tell from the scan. If anything I am bit more concerned with the way the bottom edge looks on the back. If I had to vote trimmed or not, I would side a bit more to not trimmed.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
cool thanks Leon for creating the poll for me. I didn't even think of that! Dan
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am no expert on t205's... And without a back scan...im not sure...maybe?!
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a huge front and back scan in the description area.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I vote for no trim. I was the under bidder btw.
Andrew |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blank-Backed 1934 Goudey card? | leftygrove10 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 08-30-2013 12:07 PM |
| FS: King Kelly N172 (re-backed, trimmed) | square5000 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-17-2011 08:21 AM |
| WTB a T206 Heinie Smith Polar Bear backed card | 3-2-count | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-06-2011 06:42 PM |
| WTB T206 Cycle 460 Backed Card | BleedinBlue | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-05-2010 07:55 PM |
| Opinion: Trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-27-2004 04:22 PM |