 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
06-02-2013, 06:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That is a great looking card. I am sure there has to be a wrinkle or something that can't be seen...nice card.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1915-Cracker...item19dd3cc932 .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
|
#3
06-02-2013, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
One of the finest cards I have ever seen that was graded a 4!!!
 That series is not my thing but if it was I would be very aggressive to add it to my other cards I own (but at a reasonable price). Post # 9 Last edited by Zone91; 06-03-2013 at 05:57 PM.
|
|
#4
06-02-2013, 07:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Honestly, out of the last 5 or 6 SGC graded cards I've received from various auctions, I thought SGC was pretty harsh on their grade. Could they be getting tougher? It's hard to say with such a limited sample. Needless to say, I've been pleased with recently graded cards from SGC.
|
|
#5
06-02-2013, 09:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmmmm.....the back looks funny to me. Just sayin'. Maybe it's the scan, but it looks almost too white.
__________________
Collecting HOF RCs, t206 HOF tough backs, and other cards that look cool. Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com --–----------- jimivintage@yahoo.com Jimi
|
|
#6
06-02-2013, 09:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, the back looks particularly white. That said, what could that mean?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
