1947 D323 Tip Top Bread

[timelord]

Greetings, is the 1947 Tip Top Bread considered a Major set? I believe it was issued regionally. So would any "Rookies" in this set would be true rookie cards?
Look forward to some replies.
Thank You,
Richard

[Leon]

I am not a rookie card collector anymore but I would certainly consider cards from this set when determining a rookie. Others might not but I would.

[novakjr]

Well, there's what Beckett says is a rookie, and then there's what really is a rookie. In terms of "pre-major/modern release era"(basically '47 and earlier) Barring complete obscurity, I view ANY Major League release, regardless of major or regional release status, as rookie cards..

While I'm willing to "accept" the 1948 Bowman('49 for Kell) rookie designation for these players(forgive me if I forgot any), the Berra, Spahn, Kell and Kiner to me all count as "true rookie" cards in the '47 TT set..

The listing of guys like Rizzuto and Feller(probably a few more) as RCs in '48 Bowman, is a complete and utter joke. Those type players deserve NO rookie designation in the '47 TT set, just because they fall before the '48 release.

Again, I'm willing to forgive(and accept) some of the Beckett player RC designations for '48-49 Bowman, but some are so far off, it's not even funny..

For better RC acceptance and designations, ignore Beckett, and refer to Phil's lists..
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=141603
http://www.oldcardboard.com/ref/rookies/rookieslist.asp
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=128179

While, I and others, are willing to give some lee-way to later releases than those on these lists(I'll refer to those as "acceptable rookies"), Phil is spot on, in regards to "true rookies". Although, there is still some debate as to what are cards.

[timelord]

Hello, thanks for the replies. I agree 100% about Beckett. If you go strictly by Beckett guidelines for true rookies all of the 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers are rookies because they completely ignore the pre 33 Goudey sets as rookies. Go figure. I also think that the 1947 Tip Top Bread set has some true Rookie as you mentioned Berra, Spahn, and Kell. Great looking set also. Beckett rates 1948 Bowman Berra, Spahn and I believe the Leaf Kell as true rookies. I guess because it was a Nationally distributed set as opposed to regional. I don't agree with that reasoning. The debate among collectors will always differ on true rookies because there is no specific critera that MUST be met. I know many collectors consider the players FIRST card a rookie even if it is MINOR leagues. NOT ME. Well it is fun pursuing these elusive cards rookies or not.
Thanks,
Richard

[bcbgcbrcb]

As previously mentioned, the Tip Top Bread set has a few key rookie cards that can present quite a challenge for the rookie collectors.

[timelord]

Phil, what do you think are the toughest 1947 Tip Top Bread rookies?
Thanks,
Richard

[bcbgcbrcb]

I have only focused on the HOF rookies, in order of difficulty I would say that Spahn is the toughest, Berra next and then Kell. Compared to Bowmans/Leafs, all are very tough though

[spec]

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb

As previously mentioned, the Tip Top Bread set has a few key rookie cards that can present quite a challenge for the rookie collectors.

Rather than focusing on HOF rookies, I made completing the 1947 Tip Top set a collecting priority because it provides such an interesting slice of baseball after World War II but before the maturation of the Yankee and Dodger dynasties of the 1950s. In fact, Dodger mainstays Preacher Roe and Billy Cox appear as Pirates, while eventual Yankee ace Eddie Lopat is a White Sox. Though the Phillies, Reds, Indians and Athletics are omitted, the set does include the Browns, Cubs, Tigers and Red Sox, who all made recent rare World Series appearances and the Braves, who would be in the Series for the first time in 34 years the following season.

[novakjr]

Originally Posted by timelord

I also think that the 1947 Tip Top Bread set has some true Rookie as you mentioned Berra, Spahn, and Kell. Great looking set also. Beckett rates 1948 Bowman Berra, Spahn and I believe the Leaf Kell as true rookies.
Thanks,
Richard

The Leaf wasn't a '48 issue. Often mislabeled as one though. As a '49 issue, it makes both that and the '49 Bowman, somewhat acceptable rookies for him. But yes, I'd say that the '47 is Kell's "true rookie card". I think he has the '45 team issue photo though. But that's debatable as if it's a "card" or not..

Don't forget Kiner... As the '46-49 Sports Exchange is both a larger premium, and may not even pre-date '47. As evident by the Bob Lemon in the Sports Exchange set, because there's not a chance in hell it can predate '49(while being shared with Red Rolfe as a Manager)...Although it often gets lumped at the front of the line for him, because the timespan of the issue starts in '46...

[bcbgcbrcb]

Good pick-up on the Kiner, Dave, I forgot about that one. I would be pretty comfortable in saying that the Sports Exchange premium was not issued in 1946, thus the Tip Top Bread would be a rookie card for Kiner as well. As far as difficulty, I would place that one as a little tougher than Kell but not as difficult as Spahn or Berra.

[timelord]

Greetings all, I was wondering how the 1947 Tip Top compare to the 1947 Bond Bread set? Are both sets equal in scarcity and I know Berra appears in the 1947 Bond set also. I would think either card would be considered the Rookie.
Thanks,
Richard